Gender Bound: Prisons, Trans Lives, and the Politics of Violence
Using an intersectional perspective, this dissertation investigates gender regulation within the criminal justice system, and explores how gender-nonconforming people survive and challenge carceral violence. To contextualize our current moment, I trace racialized gender regulation over nearly 80 years: from 1941 to 2018. To theorize the carceral continuum beyond the specific site of the prison, I examine the management and navigation of gender boundaries behind prison walls and in the reentry organizations trans people turn to upon release. I draw on extensive archival research, 20 months of ethnography in trans prisoner advocacy organizations, and 136 interviews with formerly incarcerated transgender people, advocates, policymakers, and former prison staff. The project makes three primary arguments. First, while we tend to think that trans prisoner policies are new, I demonstrate the persistence of prison control directed towards gender variance, albeit in historically variable ways. Second, I challenge the idea that criminalized trans women’s vulnerability is reducible gender and is primarily interpersonal, by showing how intersections of race, class, and femininity facilitate trans women’s vulnerability to both state and interpersonal violence. Third, I highlight the insurgent agency of criminalized trans women of color, refuting the dehumanization of a “total victim” frame by tracing women’s pragmatic survival strategies and collective resistance. Together, this project identifies racialized gender regulation as a core and flexible technique of the carceral system, and suggests that the experiences of criminalized trans femmes of color provide a radical critique and practical guide for change.
Categorical Exclusions: How Racialized Gender Regulation Reproduces Reentry Hardship
This article was published in Social Problems and received the 2020 Arlene Kaplan Daniels Paper Award for the best paper on women and social justice from the Society for the Study of Social Problems.
Since gender organizes key reentry services such as housing, formerly incarcerated people seeking resources must successfully inhabit a gender category. Drawing on seven months of ethnography and 79 interviews with service providers and formerly incarcerated transgender people, I show that these organizational practices of gender categorization are racialized and impact resource access. Most gender-segregated housing programs rely on biology-based definitions of gender. These gender rules create workable options for trans men to stay with women, but bar trans women from the women’s spaces they prefer. Once in gendered housing programs, clients need to navigate gender assessment in interactions. Trans men employed several strategies to establish gendered selves who were easily categorized as either male or female, which allowed them to access stable housing. Gender sanctioning posed a major problem for black trans women. Black trans women were highly scrutinized in women’s programs, characterized as illegitimate based on biological definitions of gender, and harassed for any perceived deviation from gender norms. When harassment escalated into conflict, they were expelled from programs. Regulation of black trans women’s womanhood led to systematic material deprivation. By understanding the connections between categorical exclusions and exclusion from resources we can better understand the reproduction of reentry hardship and inequality more broadly.
Parole Boards and Logics of Criminalized Masculinity
In a paper published in Theoretical Criminology (2020), “‘You’re still an angry man’: Parole boards and logics of criminalized masculinity,” Isaac Dalke and I analyze the racialized gender narratives deployed in parole hearings. Drawing on 109 California parole hearings, we show how parole commissioners use logics of deserving and dangerous masculinity to assert a boundary between men deemed ready for social reintegration and men relegated to captivity. Parole commissioners proclaim the normative masculinity of parole grantees and cite deviant masculinity to justify denials. We argue that masculinities provide culturally resonant ways to differentiate between individual men, reifying prisoners’ exclusion from the social order and masking the criminal justice system’s structural role in reinforcing racial domination.
The Social Organization of Sexual Assault
A sociological understanding of sexual violence can push beyond through a lens of sociopathy, and reveal how intersecting systems of power shape vulnerability to violence, beyond the single dimension of gender. With Shamus Khan, Claude Ann Mellins, and Jennifer S. Hirsch, I have published a paper in the Annual Review of Criminology that critically assesses the existing literature on sexual assault and suggests directions for future research.
Trans Women and Femmes of Color at Work
Like the criminal justice system, the labor market is a primary mechanism for the reproduction of inequality. But unlike the criminal justice system, the labor market can also facilitate social mobility. To understand how the labor market was maintaining or mitigating the structural exclusion of trans women and femmes of color, Woods Ervin and I conducted work history interviews with 23 transgender women and femmes of color in 5 U.S. cities. We discovered that the 2015 “Transgender Tipping Point,” mostly considered a cultural moment of increased transgender visibility, corresponded with material gains: improved employment status for the people in our sample after 2015. Yet, challenges remain. Because trans women and femmes of color gained access to stable jobs primarily in advocacy and social services, their employment “success” required them to take on emotionally taxing work. Trans women and femmes of color reported being hired by queer people, but facing ongoing hiring discrimination by straight, cisgender people. Trans women of color regularly lost jobs and, in the face of unaddressed workplace harassment, left jobs of their own accord. In June, 2020 we released a report, policy brief, and infographic with this data, all of which have been widely circulated. We are currently writing an academic paper based on the data.
Transgender Kinship Organizations
In a paper forthcoming at Organization, “Labor of Love: The Formalization of Care in Transgender Kinship Organizations” I examine a shift in the organization of care for collective trans survival. Historically, trans communities have relied on informal networks of care and chosen family to deal with the deadly combination of state violence and state neglect. The rapid rise of trans nonprofits means that more trans people now receive resources and support from formal transgender organizations, with responsibility for providing this support concentrated in the hands of a few trans staff members. But these nonprofits don’t look like traditional social service organizations. Instead, they are what I call “transgender kinship organizations,” organizations that incorporate norms, networks, and resources from kinship systems into a formal organization providing regular social services to the public. Drawing on 7 months of ethnography and 36 interviews, I explore how transgender kinship organizations function, develop, and impact broader transgender community. On the one hand, trans kinship organizations are highly responsive to crisis, are able to leverage personal and organizational resources, and are therefore capable of providing personalized rapid-response care to very precarious trans people. On the other hand, subsuming kinship within a nonprofit transforms relationships of mutual care into unidirectional service relationships and relationships of chosen family into work-based hierarchies. This account of kinship organizations contributes to the theory on organizational development and provides new conceptual tools for analyzing boundaries between organizations and communities.